OPAL HERNANDEZ, wife of James Hernandez; JAMES HERNANDEZ, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ARTHUR H. HOFFMAN; MARY C. HOFFMAN, wife of Arthur H. Hoffman; RAND W. HOFFMAN; CHERYL HOFFMAN, wife of Rand W. Hoffman; LAURA J. WETSCH, Attorney at Law; DANNY LEE ALLEN, Deputy Sheriff of Johnston County; R. FRANK GRAY, Attorney at Law, Defendants - Appellees, and KNOX V. JENKINS, Judge of Superior Court, County of Johnston, Defendant. 
No. 96-2780
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 5043

March 13, 1997, Submitted
March 18, 1997, Decided

NOTICE: [*1]  RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT. 

SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: Reported in Table Case Format at: 108 F.3d 1372, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10402.

PRIOR HISTORY: Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-96-543-5-BR). 

DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED. 

COUNSEL: Opal Hernandez, James Hernandez, Appellants Pro Se. Ralph Frank Gray, Laura J. Wetsch, JORDAN, PRICE, WALL, GRAY & JONES, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina; Howard Edwards Manning, Sr., Kristen Gardner Lingo, MANNING, FULTON & SKINNER, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. 

JUDGES: Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. 

OPINION:
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court`s order adopting the magistrate judge`s report and recommendation dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § §  1983, 1985 (1994) action. We have reviewed the record and the district court`s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hernandez v. Hoffman, No. CA-96-543-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [*2]  and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED